Skip to main content

Is it worth it to switch to led bulbs?

I recently installed a Neurio whole house energy monitor. Let's use it to see if we should replace some incandescent lights with leds.



Neurio has a web interface and a mobile app that you can use to look at real-time and historic energy usage.



Here are the lights in our living room. One light, seen in the lower right, was burnt out when we moved into the house earlier this year.



To measure the consumption of the lights I got a baseline on the mobile app with the lights turned off,


and then turned them on,



1,132 watts - 826 watts = 306 watts

306 watts / 5 lights = 61.2 watts per light

This matches pretty closely with the 65 watt consumption label on one of the lights I checked.

Neurio also provides the cost per hour of your current energy consumption, based on the electric rate that you enter when configuring your account.

From the two energy graphs you can calculate that it costs $0.05/hr to run the lights in our living room.

What would it cost for a replacement led bulb, how much would it save compared to an incandescent and how long would it take to pay for itself?



I've had spotty luck with cheap compact florescent lights. The packaging claimed a great warranty and that it will last X thousand hours but I've had several of them burn out in a matter of a year or less. In one case I tried to contact the company for a replacement and I think the number was out of service.

I'd expect led lights to be a bit more reliable, simply because they are more efficient than the compact fluorescents. Heat is a cause of failures in electronic components, leds use less power so that should mean lower temperatures. Leds don't require the same kind of starter ballast but they do require an integrated ac/dc converter.

I found these leds on Amazon:



Philips is a widely known company. If they say they've got a warranty on a product its a pretty sure bet that they'll at least be around to deny your claim and not leave you with a disconnected phone number.

I thought that $4.50 a bulb was pretty expensive but searching on Amazon for any cheaper led flood lights didn't turn up anything cheaper, so we'll stick with the Philips for now.

We typically light our living room from 6-9:30pm, so approximately 3.5 hours per day. These led bulbs consume 9 watts of power, a savings of 56 watts per light, 280 watts for all 5 lights.

The Philips 248872 appears to be a comparable flood light. Its the same brand as the led and if you buy them in a case of 12 from Home Depot they are $2.33/ea ($27.97 for the case). You can find incandescent flood lights of the same wattage that cost MORE than comparable led lights. In this case I'd recommend buying the led light for its longer life and lower cost to run.


Philips LED 462143 Philips Incandescent 248872
$4.50/ea $2.33/ea
9 watts 65 watts
650 lumens 635 lumens
10,000 hours estimated lifespan 2,000 hours estimated lifespan


The increased lifespan of the led makes it worth its extra cost. Even if the led only lasted half as many hours as expected, say 5,000 hours, you would have broken even on bulb cost and would have been saving energy the whole time. If the lifespan was 10,000 hours you would be saving several dollars over the incandescent bulb.



What if we look at energy savings alone? How long will it take for the led's lower energy consumption to offset its higher price?

$4.50 led - $2.33 incandescent = Led is $2.17 more expensive


Our living room used $0.05/hr with incandescent bulbs. Leds would consume:

9 watts * 5 lights = 45 watts with leds

45 watts led / 306 watts incandescent = 14.7%

14.7% of $0.05/hr = $0.0073/hr to run leds


Now we can calculate how long it will take to save the cost adder of the led bulb:

$2.17 / $0.0073/hr = ~300 hours

320 hours / 3hr/day = ~100 days


So after 100 days of using our living room lights 3 hours per day the electricity savings alone would pay for the increased cost of the led.

Based on these calculations switching to led bulbs makes sense. The leds would pay for themselves with electricity savings alone in a few months. If the lifespan estimates were even half of their advertised value you would break even just on the bulb cost. Looks like we'll be replacing our burnt out incandescent and compact fluorescent bulbs with leds.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

UTM (qemu on OSX) only boots into uefi shell after installing Ubuntu 22.10 (solved!)

I've been meaning to try out running Linux and Windows virtual machines on my x86 MacBook Pro using qemu . I've been using Parallels for several years. Parallels is a nice application and works well but I'm always getting bugged to purchase upgrades. Parallels provides free updates on minor version upgrades only, say 13.0 to 13.1. With so many prompts to purchase upgrades it feels like Parallels could release a bit more minor versions and a bit fewer major versions. Rather than just purchase an upgrade to Parallels I figured I'd try out qemu via the UTM application . UTM wraps qemu with a helpful gui and comes as a packages Mac application. And UTM supports both x86 and M1 systems (as qemu also supports these systems). Creating an Ubuntu VM with UTM didn't go as smoothly as with VirtualBox or Parallels but it was the settings I chose that messed me up. Here are two things I ran into when installing Ubuntu on UTM. #1. Configure the qemu instance to use a 'Display...

Debugging an imprecise bus access fault on a Cortex-M3

This information may apply to other cortex series processors but is written from practical experience with the Cortex-M3. Imprecise bus access faults are ambiguous, as noted by the term "imprecise". Compared to precise bus errors, imprecise errors are much trickier to debug and especially so without a deep understanding of arm processors and assembly language. Imprecise and precise flags are found in the BusFault status register, a byte in the CFSR (Configurable Fault Status Register). BusFault status register bits The definition for imprecise and precise bits is: [2] IMPRECISERR Imprecise data bus error: 0 = no imprecise data bus error 1 = a data bus error has occurred, but the return address in the stack frame is not related to the instruction that caused the error. When the processor sets this bit to 1, it does not write a fault address to the BFAR. This is an asynchronous fault. Therefore, if it is detected when the priority of the current pr...

Travelling on Spirit airlines out of Boston Logan airport? Here are some tips.

I attended CES 2017 in Las Vegas. Booking the trip late I ended up on Spirit airlines. It was both non-stop, making it six hours to Las Vegas from Boston, and affordable, less than $300 for a one way trip compared to around $700 with JetBlue. Here are some tips that might help you when travelling on Spirit from Boston Logan airport. Eat Spirit is located in the B-terminal, gates B-37 and 38, with its own TSA security checkpoint. While it does have restrooms and places to sit the food selection is limited to a single food stand. I'd recommend eating at the Legal C Bar (number 77 in the image below) prior to going through the terminal security checkpoint. The food and service there were great. Drink The water and other drinks are cheaper if you buy them at the food cart rather than on the flight. Seats The seats on Spirit don't recline. They do this to reduce weight, seat cost, seat maintenance costs, and so seats don't impact the free space of other passengers,...